Caitlin is not a Jew-hater. But you are, Clarence.
The fact that Caitlin is avowedly committed to the principle of unmoderated freedom of speech is the best explanation for her allowing you to pave over the comments sections with Grand Unified Theory Of Jewish Conspiracy boilerplate (who knows where else you've copypasted the exact same material; of the thousands of words and links you've posted here so far, there isn't an observation in the entire morass that's original with you.
I've known even the fiercest free speech absolutists to get fed with the exploiters of open public comment space who overwhelm their blogs and websites with unceasing axe-grinding spam posts; eventually the sheer clogging up of the conversation gets so tedious and obnoxious that their patience is exhausted. Glenn Greenwald, for example, has recurrently found in necessary to ban posters and restrict abusive, off-topic, and propaganda recruitment screeds and spam posts from his web pages. (But, you know...he's (((Glenn Greenwald)))...)
The practical reality is that the free flow of ideas of open and unfettered public discourse can only be maintained when all participants subscribe to an informal ethos that even though any poster or group could dominate a discussion (in some sense) simply by using swarms and copypasta tactics- "winning" through the intimidation of blanketing column-inches with their adverts- there's a common recognition of the unscrupulous character of such tactics that every participant voluntarily refrains from them. Once that informal consensus breaks down, the golden age of free speech is over, and the private proprietors of any webpage are justified in resorting to restrictive policing tactics.
It also has to be said that those measures bear no resemblance to the advocacy of policing entire platforms with preemptive surveillance and censorship. People have the power to exert agency over their own personal efforts, that's all. It isn't a license for toxic parasites to abuse them.
You are blocked from subscribing to Clarence Wilhelm Spangle and their publications"
I see that you blocked me from your Substack page, as of a few hours ago. That's your personal prerogative, of course. As it is for anyone else keeping up their own web page on the Internet.
Caitlin is not a Jew-hater. But you are, Clarence.
The fact that Caitlin is avowedly committed to the principle of unmoderated freedom of speech is the best explanation for her allowing you to pave over the comments sections with Grand Unified Theory Of Jewish Conspiracy boilerplate (who knows where else you've copypasted the exact same material; of the thousands of words and links you've posted here so far, there isn't an observation in the entire morass that's original with you.
I've known even the fiercest free speech absolutists to get fed with the exploiters of open public comment space who overwhelm their blogs and websites with unceasing axe-grinding spam posts; eventually the sheer clogging up of the conversation gets so tedious and obnoxious that their patience is exhausted. Glenn Greenwald, for example, has recurrently found in necessary to ban posters and restrict abusive, off-topic, and propaganda recruitment screeds and spam posts from his web pages. (But, you know...he's (((Glenn Greenwald)))...)
The practical reality is that the free flow of ideas of open and unfettered public discourse can only be maintained when all participants subscribe to an informal ethos that even though any poster or group could dominate a discussion (in some sense) simply by using swarms and copypasta tactics- "winning" through the intimidation of blanketing column-inches with their adverts- there's a common recognition of the unscrupulous character of such tactics that every participant voluntarily refrains from them. Once that informal consensus breaks down, the golden age of free speech is over, and the private proprietors of any webpage are justified in resorting to restrictive policing tactics.
It also has to be said that those measures bear no resemblance to the advocacy of policing entire platforms with preemptive surveillance and censorship. People have the power to exert agency over their own personal efforts, that's all. It isn't a license for toxic parasites to abuse them.
Rather predictable that current Israeli crimes would elicit these types of Jew-baiting filth.
Thanks for doing research. It's a rare quality today. If you're not familiar with Grand Theft world and Richard Grove I think you'd enjoy the program.
"Clarence Wilhelm Spangle blocked you
You are blocked from subscribing to Clarence Wilhelm Spangle and their publications"
I see that you blocked me from your Substack page, as of a few hours ago. That's your personal prerogative, of course. As it is for anyone else keeping up their own web page on the Internet.
I wish I had some tips to offer to you, about how to increase your unpopularity. But you seem to have it covered. Leaning into the opportunism.
That said, does there have to be so much of it?
Who could fail to be convinced by your indictment of me, given the amount of evidence that you've amassed to support it?