"You can’t “lesser evil” a genocide. That’s not a thing. Past a certain line a candidate is just plain evil, and if genocide is not on the other side of that line for you, then it no longer makes sense for you to talk about “evil” — or any other moral distinction for that matter. "
Well said. If your candidate can't pass a simple "litmus test" that says, "Does NOT aid or condone genocide" then this person isn't worth voting for--or even worth listening to. They should be locked up for life.
"You can’t “lesser evil” a genocide. That’s not a thing. Past a certain line a candidate is just plain evil, and if genocide is not on the other side of that line for you, then it no longer makes sense for you to talk about “evil” — or any other moral distinction for that matter. "
Well said. If your candidate can't pass a simple "litmus test" that says, "Does NOT aid or condone genocide" then this person isn't worth voting for--or even worth listening to. They should be locked up for life.
I came up with my "litmus test" last November and plan to stick with it. https://therevolutioncontinues.substack.com/p/the-new-litmus-test