Sadly , yes “russian_bot”, it is common knowledge, and can be verified many times over. However, the most prominent is that of E. Jean Carrol. The criminal statute was timed out, however (?), the Civil Court has no such limitations. When tried by a jury of his peers, Mr Trump was found to be “civilly liable” #GULITY for the molestation, assault, and rape (it was clearly defined as such); of Ms. E. Jean Carrol. He was therefore ordered to pay out 83.5 million dollars in recompense for his illegal assault, along with the pain, suffering and psychological suffering caused by the
rape.
He has also indicted, but not tried for almost 20 other assaults.
yet there was no evidence presented at the Carroll trial, she pressed no charges 30 years ago and has no witnesses or evidence of any kind. She is an obvious man hating opportunist funded by a billionaire that hates Trump.
Here you are being completely blind to the fact that the democrats and Biden have weaponized the judicial system against their political opponent and you find nothing wrong with that ?
That weaponization is fascist to its core yet you are fine it ? Why is that ?
I intended to be flippant. How can one prove something that happened long ago? Have you not been assaulted? Or feel like you have? Can you bring up a case right now against those assailants and claim similar rewards?
My case did not get the kind of publicity that Ms. Carrol’s case did. However, my case managed to convict a powerful legal and religious figure in the State of Washington and California.
They were indicted for 7 other assaults but mine was the one prosecuted successfully.
It took 10 years to build the case and verify the evidence.
The DA and AG’s offices had this person in their files for at least 30 years. It takes that long to gather evidence. The Judge ordered the case re opened within one year of the limitations ban. So yes, be as flippant as you want, if that is what you wish.
Now, if you are consistent and honest, you should admit that same kinds of things could be brought up against Biden etc. Those on "your side", whatever that side might be. Do you agree?
They might yes, however (?), those statutes have run out many years ago. Also lacking any consistent testimonies or proof, re opening a file is all but impossible. Powerful men are like Teflon, nothing sticks to them:
Unless someone who is unassailable in testimony, and has the assistance of several coo berating witnesses, along with former accusers testimonies that have also befn verified(?), no DA ‘s office or AG’s staff would ever get involved. No such verified accounts are exist in regards to Mr Biden I’m afraid: (much as many would dearly wish there to be). However, Mr Trump , like Mr Clinton before him(?), did not bother to hide the evidence and openly bragged about his “conquests”. Both of these now former Presidents were arrogant enough to believe that the law did not apply to them and assumed incorrectly they could could “get away with it. They were wrong.
You could always bribes some politicians to do what NYC did and pass a law that specifically nullifies the statute of limitations so you can pursue 30 year old claims ?
No coo berating evidence was found. None of it could be verified in discovery, nor could eyewitness accounts be made. Also, all of the 7 women were either not available, made several testimonies that were later discovered to have been either false, and even contrary to the evidence presented by other witnesses who could be verified to have actually been there and and aided the victims. Apparently all 7 had made accusations regarding several other men, and 4 admitted to having been financially compensated for their accounts. Those compensations (interestingly??), came from foreign sources , (and no they were not Chinese, Iranian , or Russian). The other remaining three were found to be mentally unstable, and were in therapy before the assaults were to have taken place.
No AG or DA would ever take their testimony into open court only to be told it was heresy and not be entered into evidence.
Tara R. on the other hand was a proven extortionist and stalker: several business associates, (4 to be exact) had testified in chambers that she had stalked and harassed them , stolen money, and frequently threatened and accused at least 3 other men and their families as she filed assault charges against them as well.
As a survivor, I dearly wish that all women who had to suffer as I did, get their day in court and to have the success that I and Ms Carrol did. But that is not always the case, as sad I am to admit that.
Sadly , yes “russian_bot”, it is common knowledge, and can be verified many times over. However, the most prominent is that of E. Jean Carrol. The criminal statute was timed out, however (?), the Civil Court has no such limitations. When tried by a jury of his peers, Mr Trump was found to be “civilly liable” #GULITY for the molestation, assault, and rape (it was clearly defined as such); of Ms. E. Jean Carrol. He was therefore ordered to pay out 83.5 million dollars in recompense for his illegal assault, along with the pain, suffering and psychological suffering caused by the
rape.
He has also indicted, but not tried for almost 20 other assaults.
yet there was no evidence presented at the Carroll trial, she pressed no charges 30 years ago and has no witnesses or evidence of any kind. She is an obvious man hating opportunist funded by a billionaire that hates Trump.
Here you are being completely blind to the fact that the democrats and Biden have weaponized the judicial system against their political opponent and you find nothing wrong with that ?
That weaponization is fascist to its core yet you are fine it ? Why is that ?
Are you one of those 20?
I intended to be flippant. How can one prove something that happened long ago? Have you not been assaulted? Or feel like you have? Can you bring up a case right now against those assailants and claim similar rewards?
I could and I HAVE.
My case did not get the kind of publicity that Ms. Carrol’s case did. However, my case managed to convict a powerful legal and religious figure in the State of Washington and California.
They were indicted for 7 other assaults but mine was the one prosecuted successfully.
It took 10 years to build the case and verify the evidence.
The DA and AG’s offices had this person in their files for at least 30 years. It takes that long to gather evidence. The Judge ordered the case re opened within one year of the limitations ban. So yes, be as flippant as you want, if that is what you wish.
Very well!
Now, if you are consistent and honest, you should admit that same kinds of things could be brought up against Biden etc. Those on "your side", whatever that side might be. Do you agree?
They might yes, however (?), those statutes have run out many years ago. Also lacking any consistent testimonies or proof, re opening a file is all but impossible. Powerful men are like Teflon, nothing sticks to them:
Unless someone who is unassailable in testimony, and has the assistance of several coo berating witnesses, along with former accusers testimonies that have also befn verified(?), no DA ‘s office or AG’s staff would ever get involved. No such verified accounts are exist in regards to Mr Biden I’m afraid: (much as many would dearly wish there to be). However, Mr Trump , like Mr Clinton before him(?), did not bother to hide the evidence and openly bragged about his “conquests”. Both of these now former Presidents were arrogant enough to believe that the law did not apply to them and assumed incorrectly they could could “get away with it. They were wrong.
You could always bribes some politicians to do what NYC did and pass a law that specifically nullifies the statute of limitations so you can pursue 30 year old claims ?
Of course they got away with it.
"No such verified accounts are exist in regards to Mr Biden I’m afraid" - are you discarding Tara Reade and "seven women" here: https://news.yahoo.com/seven-women-have-now-accused-joe-biden-of-inappropriate-touching-131204785.html?
Again,
No coo berating evidence was found. None of it could be verified in discovery, nor could eyewitness accounts be made. Also, all of the 7 women were either not available, made several testimonies that were later discovered to have been either false, and even contrary to the evidence presented by other witnesses who could be verified to have actually been there and and aided the victims. Apparently all 7 had made accusations regarding several other men, and 4 admitted to having been financially compensated for their accounts. Those compensations (interestingly??), came from foreign sources , (and no they were not Chinese, Iranian , or Russian). The other remaining three were found to be mentally unstable, and were in therapy before the assaults were to have taken place.
No AG or DA would ever take their testimony into open court only to be told it was heresy and not be entered into evidence.
Tara R. on the other hand was a proven extortionist and stalker: several business associates, (4 to be exact) had testified in chambers that she had stalked and harassed them , stolen money, and frequently threatened and accused at least 3 other men and their families as she filed assault charges against them as well.
As a survivor, I dearly wish that all women who had to suffer as I did, get their day in court and to have the success that I and Ms Carrol did. But that is not always the case, as sad I am to admit that.