"I am not really sure what Trump seriously tried to do in a positive sense that was short stopped by the Democrats."
Democrats screamed bloody murder when Trump talked to Putin in Helsinki. The same people who criticized the CIA for lying about Iraqi WMDs were livid that Trump would doubt made up reports of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Democrats screamed bloody murder again (twice) when he made noises about withdrawing troops from NE Syria, and yet again, even passing legislation to prohibit it when he announced a withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Democrats failed to criticize, sometimes even applauded most of the awful things Trump did in international relations such as bombing Syria twice after false flag chemical attacks. Their response to recognizing Guaido was, "Yeah, Maduro is a tyrant.
Trump is not a fascist or a racist. More blacks voted for Trump in 2020 than in 2016 and more than for any other Republican candidate in the 20th or 21st Century. He actually lost support among white males.
You've provided an excellent example of precisely what Caitlin wrote about. Thank you.
You wrote: "The same people who criticized the CIA for lying about Iraqi WMDs were livid that Trump would doubt made up reports of Russian interference in the 2016 election." Well, first of all, very few of the Democrats who jumped all over Trump for the CIA lying about Iraqi WMDs, really had much critically to say as most of them had supported overthrowing Saddam in any case, following the PNAC line.
You wrote: "Democrats screamed bloody murder again (twice) when he made noises about withdrawing troops from NE Syria, and yet again, even passing legislation to prohibit it when he announced a withdrawal from Afghanistan." Sure, the Democrats have largely been the war party but Trump, who had dropped the MOAB blockbuster (the largest in the US non-nuclear arsenal) didn't follow through on withdrawing troops but shifted some who were there to Saudi Arabia where he upped support for the Saudis and, as I mentioned before, went further than any president in pushing Iran into what would be a devastating war, far worse than what has happened in Syria.
The point I was making that Trump has been unlike other presidents while Caitlin contends otherwise and I provided in my post solid evidence to back up my position. While NOT a supporter of Assad (I have had personal experiences with his father's regime and it is evident that torture is part of his regime as it is of most countries on the planet, including ours and Caitlin's--Assad, after all, like Khadafy, were participants in the CIA's rendition/torture program--I have opposed the regime plans of the US and its allies which were first called to attention by Michael Flynn, who now seems to be off his rocker, when he headed the DIA and opposed them. I also did not buy the chemical warfare stories any more than did the now disappeared Seymour Hersh and my late friend, Robert Fisk, neither of whom were pro-Assad but pro-truth. That's my position which clearly makes you uncomfortable but nevertheless safe in remaining anonymous.
Every time you post you prove Caitlin's point by showing yourself incapable of acknowledging the few things Trump has done right or tried, like being willing to talk to the Russians and North Korea. He tried to have Flynn as his NS Advisor, but that was blocked. Maybe things would have been different if Flynn had remained. Like maybe Flynn would have pointed out that some of his generals were insubordinate by ignoring his orders to prepare withdrawal from Syria. Flynn is not off his rocker, and that suggestion is just another symptom of your own TDS.
"I am not really sure what Trump seriously tried to do in a positive sense that was short stopped by the Democrats."
Democrats screamed bloody murder when Trump talked to Putin in Helsinki. The same people who criticized the CIA for lying about Iraqi WMDs were livid that Trump would doubt made up reports of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Democrats screamed bloody murder again (twice) when he made noises about withdrawing troops from NE Syria, and yet again, even passing legislation to prohibit it when he announced a withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Democrats failed to criticize, sometimes even applauded most of the awful things Trump did in international relations such as bombing Syria twice after false flag chemical attacks. Their response to recognizing Guaido was, "Yeah, Maduro is a tyrant.
Trump is not a fascist or a racist. More blacks voted for Trump in 2020 than in 2016 and more than for any other Republican candidate in the 20th or 21st Century. He actually lost support among white males.
You've provided an excellent example of precisely what Caitlin wrote about. Thank you.
You wrote: "The same people who criticized the CIA for lying about Iraqi WMDs were livid that Trump would doubt made up reports of Russian interference in the 2016 election." Well, first of all, very few of the Democrats who jumped all over Trump for the CIA lying about Iraqi WMDs, really had much critically to say as most of them had supported overthrowing Saddam in any case, following the PNAC line.
You wrote: "Democrats screamed bloody murder again (twice) when he made noises about withdrawing troops from NE Syria, and yet again, even passing legislation to prohibit it when he announced a withdrawal from Afghanistan." Sure, the Democrats have largely been the war party but Trump, who had dropped the MOAB blockbuster (the largest in the US non-nuclear arsenal) didn't follow through on withdrawing troops but shifted some who were there to Saudi Arabia where he upped support for the Saudis and, as I mentioned before, went further than any president in pushing Iran into what would be a devastating war, far worse than what has happened in Syria.
The point I was making that Trump has been unlike other presidents while Caitlin contends otherwise and I provided in my post solid evidence to back up my position. While NOT a supporter of Assad (I have had personal experiences with his father's regime and it is evident that torture is part of his regime as it is of most countries on the planet, including ours and Caitlin's--Assad, after all, like Khadafy, were participants in the CIA's rendition/torture program--I have opposed the regime plans of the US and its allies which were first called to attention by Michael Flynn, who now seems to be off his rocker, when he headed the DIA and opposed them. I also did not buy the chemical warfare stories any more than did the now disappeared Seymour Hersh and my late friend, Robert Fisk, neither of whom were pro-Assad but pro-truth. That's my position which clearly makes you uncomfortable but nevertheless safe in remaining anonymous.
Every time you post you prove Caitlin's point by showing yourself incapable of acknowledging the few things Trump has done right or tried, like being willing to talk to the Russians and North Korea. He tried to have Flynn as his NS Advisor, but that was blocked. Maybe things would have been different if Flynn had remained. Like maybe Flynn would have pointed out that some of his generals were insubordinate by ignoring his orders to prepare withdrawal from Syria. Flynn is not off his rocker, and that suggestion is just another symptom of your own TDS.
Do you believe Flynn's recent call for Trump to declare martial law the actions of a sane person?
Flynn did not "call for Trump to declare martial law." A reference to something is not necessarily an endorsement of it. Keep digging.
Then why did he even bring it up? At the bottom, you really come across as another Trumpsucker.