Well written and thought provoking and I AGREE almost 100%.
On China, and Humanity World Wide, there Obviously are those amongst us that seek Power and Wealth to the Exclusion of others. To go Communist or Corporist or NWO or whatever "Ism" isn't a Solution. Seeking to better one's survival via increased wealth isn't Evil, It's the Exclusion of the Opportunity to Others that is Evil. Keeping everyone "Equal" by Law is Equally Evil as those Doing the Equalizing are the "New Boss, same as the Old Boss". Has anyone ever read the book "Animal Farm"???
As far as China, let's focus on their Rulers, the ChiComs, sElected by their Commissars, not all that different from this USSA, just the terminology.
Chinese History shows it is Dominant via the Vassal State System by Bribes of Foreign Leaders and Economics as more Effective Control than Kinetic War. Smart, but with the same Goals as Rome, Great Britain, or the USA-(USSA in my opinion)
I don't think We/Me/You will like living under any further NWO ChiCom Domination. But I do agree that Reform starts here at home. Then what and how is another big discussion. I would suggest a pruning of the Feral Gov (and State Govs) back to Basics, a Constitutional Republic where people are Free to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
There is No Utopia on Earth, Freedom doesn't mean to Dominate Others who may have other Life Pursuits. I never equated Individual Wealth with Happiness, but neither is Pervasive Poverty a noble goal, imo. If the Individual is Suppressed, the Society Suffers as well. Venezuela is a prime example.
I wish the best for everyone to live peaceful, productive lives. Conducting themselves accordingly.
The UN NWO is already Invading the USA over it's Southern Borderless Area. Blue UN Helmets make excellent targets for America's Deer Hunters at distance.
Each country must Handle it's Own problems internally, That I agree with you on.
I'd much rather destroy power and shatter the shitty little theater in which you're play-acting your supremacy and your infantile narratives of conquest, and destroy your ability to waste any part of anyone else's life on your dramas.
Only slaves and slavers want power to exist at all. Which one are you?
You wanted the original Constitution back. Leaving many other questions aside, I would presume that you are also asking for a society that supports aristocratic relations, mainly, a restricted franchise dependent on a theory of property creation that is no longer practical or useful (homestead claims).
Still, if everyone had a home, and everyone OWNED their home (As in Gadhaffi's Libya), and that was the LAW, then the 'homesteading' wouldn't be so bad. It would be universal suffrage with knobs on. One less Rentier mob to worry about, AND a much needed weakening of the Bankster rentiers too!
"That was the LAW" skeeves me out because who exactly is bound by this idealistic dictate is unclear.
Now we have to ask about what "having" a home vs. "owning" a home means, on what basis a society shall issue homes or recognize "ownership" or recognize residents as "persons", what sort of market (if any) there will be in dwellings, what sort of class systems we are constructing within the home (as they will be reproduced in adult social life), what of people who change jobs, irreconcilable differences, family splits, etc.
Unfortunately, I predict that the answers to these questions will call to reenact English Puritanism, which does nothing well but multiply and destroy.
i think your opinions are, let's say, 'ill-informed' (e.g. 'china's ruling class is the 'problem'', 'venezuela is a prime example') and underestimate the sophistication of empire's propaganda machine. who benefits from the opnions you espouse? a more radical approach is needed, imo.
Well written and thought provoking and I AGREE almost 100%.
On China, and Humanity World Wide, there Obviously are those amongst us that seek Power and Wealth to the Exclusion of others. To go Communist or Corporist or NWO or whatever "Ism" isn't a Solution. Seeking to better one's survival via increased wealth isn't Evil, It's the Exclusion of the Opportunity to Others that is Evil. Keeping everyone "Equal" by Law is Equally Evil as those Doing the Equalizing are the "New Boss, same as the Old Boss". Has anyone ever read the book "Animal Farm"???
As far as China, let's focus on their Rulers, the ChiComs, sElected by their Commissars, not all that different from this USSA, just the terminology.
Chinese History shows it is Dominant via the Vassal State System by Bribes of Foreign Leaders and Economics as more Effective Control than Kinetic War. Smart, but with the same Goals as Rome, Great Britain, or the USA-(USSA in my opinion)
I don't think We/Me/You will like living under any further NWO ChiCom Domination. But I do agree that Reform starts here at home. Then what and how is another big discussion. I would suggest a pruning of the Feral Gov (and State Govs) back to Basics, a Constitutional Republic where people are Free to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
There is No Utopia on Earth, Freedom doesn't mean to Dominate Others who may have other Life Pursuits. I never equated Individual Wealth with Happiness, but neither is Pervasive Poverty a noble goal, imo. If the Individual is Suppressed, the Society Suffers as well. Venezuela is a prime example.
I wish the best for everyone to live peaceful, productive lives. Conducting themselves accordingly.
The USA needs a United Nations "Intervention", and stripping of all its WMDs.
And then an ENFORCED 'Back to the original Constitition' - on the policies AGAINST "Standing Armies".
Let the USA have its national Militias defending its naturally-defendable borders.
It is all they need, and it is all the REST of us need too.
The UN NWO is already Invading the USA over it's Southern Borderless Area. Blue UN Helmets make excellent targets for America's Deer Hunters at distance.
Each country must Handle it's Own problems internally, That I agree with you on.
The Federal regime will one day turn upon the militias, if the militias get angsty about the ongoing DNC coup.
The UN intervention would be as much to save them, as the rest of the planet.
Without a doubt they'd be ordered to.
Also, I'd add 'Shay's Rebellion' to that list too.
No, aristocrats should be converted into meat, not allowed to speak.
A Typical Commiecrat Comment
A typical fascist response.
I'd much rather destroy power and shatter the shitty little theater in which you're play-acting your supremacy and your infantile narratives of conquest, and destroy your ability to waste any part of anyone else's life on your dramas.
Only slaves and slavers want power to exist at all. Which one are you?
Bravo : )
"am blocked for liking it". How can we help? (pronoun alert!)
What do aristocrats have to do with what I said?
You wanted the original Constitution back. Leaving many other questions aside, I would presume that you are also asking for a society that supports aristocratic relations, mainly, a restricted franchise dependent on a theory of property creation that is no longer practical or useful (homestead claims).
AHH, getcha lol. :'D
Still, if everyone had a home, and everyone OWNED their home (As in Gadhaffi's Libya), and that was the LAW, then the 'homesteading' wouldn't be so bad. It would be universal suffrage with knobs on. One less Rentier mob to worry about, AND a much needed weakening of the Bankster rentiers too!
"That was the LAW" skeeves me out because who exactly is bound by this idealistic dictate is unclear.
Now we have to ask about what "having" a home vs. "owning" a home means, on what basis a society shall issue homes or recognize "ownership" or recognize residents as "persons", what sort of market (if any) there will be in dwellings, what sort of class systems we are constructing within the home (as they will be reproduced in adult social life), what of people who change jobs, irreconcilable differences, family splits, etc.
Unfortunately, I predict that the answers to these questions will call to reenact English Puritanism, which does nothing well but multiply and destroy.
The UN? Those pussies? Don't make me laugh.
I didn't say that was realistic. I simply said it was needed.
i think your opinions are, let's say, 'ill-informed' (e.g. 'china's ruling class is the 'problem'', 'venezuela is a prime example') and underestimate the sophistication of empire's propaganda machine. who benefits from the opnions you espouse? a more radical approach is needed, imo.
Who "benefits" from "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness"???
What is Your Radical approach???
Just Who/Whom is under the influence of Who/Whom's propaganda??? Is The Question.
The U.S. government hasn't ever believed in "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Look around you. Do you see it anywhere?
It Begins with You. Governments are a necessary evil At Best which is rare. I wish you well
i have a hunch that it always has been 'the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of the owning class'.
become a communist, just to see what happens. :-)
both of us were probably raised and educated under capital-ism.
I do not like the Borg, Comrade. I'm a Kulak, and armed. Proceed ....
Revealingly, you omitted this condition: you know, government and democracy as necessary to secure those rights:
"That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
The U.S. constitution has been a dead letter as far as the government is concerned, for a long time.