his youtube videos were "anti-feminist, misogynistic and appealed to incels", apparently. I didn't say he was an incel. I said I have problems with the incel side of him. Lots of men have a wife and kids and they are misogynists.
And WHO wrote that about him? The same assholes who've been attacking Andrew Tate, in the attempt to silence him, as well. You should probably watch his videos, yourself, if you want to form an honest opinion - rather than getting it from the OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD spooks at "The Daily Beast", the New York Times/WaPo, or Wikipedia.
While I'm sure I don't agree with all of his takes - the quote you provided is transparently part of a campaign designed to discredit and "cancel" him on the fauxgressive to ShitLib "left", since he posed real problems for their Ukraine proxy war narratives.
Actually, I did watch something by him quite a while back and I didn't like him. I thought he seemed to want attention. You like him, it seems. go ahead. I am not here to convert you to my way of thinking.
That's NOT my point. You say you saw "something" - what exactly? Why didn't you "like" it? FACTS don't care about your feelings - and his reporting from close to the front (in Kharkov) and from Kiev was honest and important.
I don't care about his alleged misogyny - though I honestly never saw it, personally, in any of his reporting or interviews. I saw a guy whose personal politics I didn't always agree with - but that was irrelevant to his reporting on the situation in Ukraine, and they rarely intruded.
No. Unlike you - second hand opinions, particularly those generated by CIA influence operations, don't have much effect upon me... certainly not to the point of my repeating slanders, or discounting honest reporting.
I don't waste much time worrying about it, personally. And it's often in the eye of the beholder. I never heard him say anything indicative of him hating women - did you? What specifically?
I know that it's one of the PSYOP handles, that the CIA uses to manipulate the attention and the focus of the weak-minded. And that was their initial go-to, when he became an inconvenient symbol of the West betraying its own values, in the support of Nazis.
Likewise, with Andrew Tate. I'm sure there's plenty that I disagree with him about - but I'm not going to be complicit in the DNCIA's efforts to silence and marginalize him - particularly since he spends plenty of time speaking uncomfortable truths to the powerful, on subjects like the Genocide in Gaza, and other pet projects of the elite.
I once heard Amy Goodman interview Larry Flynt... And I saw an insufferable and untalented opportunist, named Aura Bogado, attack Amy Goodman, and KPFK's best Manager of this Century, (if not all time) Eva Georgia, in unfair ways, using this same kind of flawed reasoning, that you seem so committed to.
If someone has something important to say - listen to them - and don't get distracted by the Ad Hominems and CIA Bullshit. If you disagree - attack their arguments - not YOUR OPINION, or the received opinions of others, about them, personally.
He wasn't an "Incel". He had a wife and kids.
his youtube videos were "anti-feminist, misogynistic and appealed to incels", apparently. I didn't say he was an incel. I said I have problems with the incel side of him. Lots of men have a wife and kids and they are misogynists.
And WHO wrote that about him? The same assholes who've been attacking Andrew Tate, in the attempt to silence him, as well. You should probably watch his videos, yourself, if you want to form an honest opinion - rather than getting it from the OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD spooks at "The Daily Beast", the New York Times/WaPo, or Wikipedia.
While I'm sure I don't agree with all of his takes - the quote you provided is transparently part of a campaign designed to discredit and "cancel" him on the fauxgressive to ShitLib "left", since he posed real problems for their Ukraine proxy war narratives.
Actually, I did watch something by him quite a while back and I didn't like him. I thought he seemed to want attention. You like him, it seems. go ahead. I am not here to convert you to my way of thinking.
That's NOT my point. You say you saw "something" - what exactly? Why didn't you "like" it? FACTS don't care about your feelings - and his reporting from close to the front (in Kharkov) and from Kiev was honest and important.
I don't care about his alleged misogyny - though I honestly never saw it, personally, in any of his reporting or interviews. I saw a guy whose personal politics I didn't always agree with - but that was irrelevant to his reporting on the situation in Ukraine, and they rarely intruded.
No. Unlike you - second hand opinions, particularly those generated by CIA influence operations, don't have much effect upon me... certainly not to the point of my repeating slanders, or discounting honest reporting.
I do care about misogyny. Odd that, but true. So you go your way, I will go mine.
Misogyny has nothing to do with the issues. It is totally irrelevant. Go talk to Samantha Power. Stop trolling here.
I don't waste much time worrying about it, personally. And it's often in the eye of the beholder. I never heard him say anything indicative of him hating women - did you? What specifically?
I know that it's one of the PSYOP handles, that the CIA uses to manipulate the attention and the focus of the weak-minded. And that was their initial go-to, when he became an inconvenient symbol of the West betraying its own values, in the support of Nazis.
Likewise, with Andrew Tate. I'm sure there's plenty that I disagree with him about - but I'm not going to be complicit in the DNCIA's efforts to silence and marginalize him - particularly since he spends plenty of time speaking uncomfortable truths to the powerful, on subjects like the Genocide in Gaza, and other pet projects of the elite.
I once heard Amy Goodman interview Larry Flynt... And I saw an insufferable and untalented opportunist, named Aura Bogado, attack Amy Goodman, and KPFK's best Manager of this Century, (if not all time) Eva Georgia, in unfair ways, using this same kind of flawed reasoning, that you seem so committed to.
If someone has something important to say - listen to them - and don't get distracted by the Ad Hominems and CIA Bullshit. If you disagree - attack their arguments - not YOUR OPINION, or the received opinions of others, about them, personally.