I don't agree. Milk, once contaminated is of a whole, completely integrated and dissolved, but the articles are discrete. It's more like something that doesn't dissolve but is in the milk that can be seen and strained out. One is able to scrutinize and use judgment which is not possible with something dissolved in milk, or added to other fungible goods. Not that you shouldn't be careful, but it is better than the NYT, and many others, and if you know where they fall short, basically they are "Democratic party sycophants," they have some good articles and writers on other topics.
I totally don’t agree. It’s a milieux at any media outlet, set and controlled by the editor, not a bunch of little particles that can think what they want to Everyone in the milieux complies, tacitly, knows where the guard rails are and stays well within them. BTW, seen anything lately about how Killary makes money off the prison system in the US?
I don't agree. Milk, once contaminated is of a whole, completely integrated and dissolved, but the articles are discrete. It's more like something that doesn't dissolve but is in the milk that can be seen and strained out. One is able to scrutinize and use judgment which is not possible with something dissolved in milk, or added to other fungible goods. Not that you shouldn't be careful, but it is better than the NYT, and many others, and if you know where they fall short, basically they are "Democratic party sycophants," they have some good articles and writers on other topics.
I totally don’t agree. It’s a milieux at any media outlet, set and controlled by the editor, not a bunch of little particles that can think what they want to Everyone in the milieux complies, tacitly, knows where the guard rails are and stays well within them. BTW, seen anything lately about how Killary makes money off the prison system in the US?