“The goal is to normalize internet censorship, whether or not you like the controversial person being banded is irrelevant”, the point is internet censorship is our undoing and the tool of our oppressors.
Caitlin is our leader yes? Her’s is an honest inquiry and it is our habit and pleasure to sup at her table, receive her wisdom, yes?
What does this piece, Caitlin’s analysis, portend for your understanding of Trump? What should we conclude? Where you aghast at Trump, do you now rethink what his presidency means. Not him, he was a doufus, the fact of an unauthorized person winning that office. An unauthorized President!
The cascade of lies and censorship that resulted is fearsome and the real nature of America has been laid bare, the Orange one reordered the world as no one has since FDR. His affect, no doubt your concern, was altogether needed, it’s to complicated, altogether opaque this the reality of power but we knew, we intuited it, their lies were felt more than understood and along came the bloviating monster transgressing all that is decent and we flocked to him. An ignoramus stands between us and the prospect of total control, yes he will fail, the die is cast, they will win, but for now we can still rage against the dying light - the dream that was America.
I'm hoping that the false dichotomy between the current flask of baboons or Trump isn't what we've been reduced to. Trump always was and will remain a symptom of what is wrong. If we hover too long over this false pitch, then we acquiesce to our own demise all the more. (I know, we've had this conversation before, so you needn't reply.) ;-)
I actually agree with you. I tried to capture that when I say that it is an ignoramus that stands between us and them totally controlling us. It’s bizarre.
“The goal is to normalize internet censorship, whether or not you like the controversial person being banded is irrelevant”, the point is internet censorship is our undoing and the tool of our oppressors.
Caitlin is our leader yes? Her’s is an honest inquiry and it is our habit and pleasure to sup at her table, receive her wisdom, yes?
What does this piece, Caitlin’s analysis, portend for your understanding of Trump? What should we conclude? Where you aghast at Trump, do you now rethink what his presidency means. Not him, he was a doufus, the fact of an unauthorized person winning that office. An unauthorized President!
The cascade of lies and censorship that resulted is fearsome and the real nature of America has been laid bare, the Orange one reordered the world as no one has since FDR. His affect, no doubt your concern, was altogether needed, it’s to complicated, altogether opaque this the reality of power but we knew, we intuited it, their lies were felt more than understood and along came the bloviating monster transgressing all that is decent and we flocked to him. An ignoramus stands between us and the prospect of total control, yes he will fail, the die is cast, they will win, but for now we can still rage against the dying light - the dream that was America.
Fuck off, I’m for Trump.
I'm hoping that the false dichotomy between the current flask of baboons or Trump isn't what we've been reduced to. Trump always was and will remain a symptom of what is wrong. If we hover too long over this false pitch, then we acquiesce to our own demise all the more. (I know, we've had this conversation before, so you needn't reply.) ;-)
I actually agree with you. I tried to capture that when I say that it is an ignoramus that stands between us and them totally controlling us. It’s bizarre.