Capitalism cannot abide democracy. When the individual is the star of the model, the expectation that a government can act in the best interest of the society is fantasy. Germany serves as a good example. Germany, following their rebuild after WWII, built a parliamentarian government that was not attached to dogmatic homage to any ideology. They were capitalist in business and banking and legal affairs, but sought to maintain clean elections and autonomous governance. They had bureaucrats sit down with business leaders and trade union representatives, and they hashed out ground rules. They went on to become the most successful economy in Europe, and had the manufacturing and political infrastructure to lead the continent into a quasi-federated network. For years, they had a military budget that was intentionally dwarfed because of concerns of a return to aggression. That led to a relationship with the U.S. that was a dependent/enabler situation. Germany was a sort of silent partner in NATO, and completely in sync with anxious concerns about Soviet expansion. The U.S. bought German cooperation by assuming the latter’s military role and eating the costs. But fast forward to the present, and Germany’s chickens are coming home to roost. And this is the immutable nature of the capitalist model. Germany is all in on NATO... which is a de facto military representative of the EU. The demolition of the 20 billion-dollar Nordstream pipeline is the cost of allowing the U.S. to make policy on its behalf. The next elections in Germany should be interesting.
Not a problem for me comrade; I cannot abide a demoncrazy. That word is not to be found in a single document of the founding of this country.
So hence the divide, I favor a Republic where Rights are supposed to be guaranteed to the individual. That democRats have eroded the Republic to almost nothing remaining and now they blame what they have activelt destroyed as the problem is classical Bolshevik demonization.
NATO-UN-NWO-EU is all the same ball of tyranny imo. so we might agree on that, but not on your "solutions".
Capitalism cannot abide democracy. When the individual is the star of the model, the expectation that a government can act in the best interest of the society is fantasy. Germany serves as a good example. Germany, following their rebuild after WWII, built a parliamentarian government that was not attached to dogmatic homage to any ideology. They were capitalist in business and banking and legal affairs, but sought to maintain clean elections and autonomous governance. They had bureaucrats sit down with business leaders and trade union representatives, and they hashed out ground rules. They went on to become the most successful economy in Europe, and had the manufacturing and political infrastructure to lead the continent into a quasi-federated network. For years, they had a military budget that was intentionally dwarfed because of concerns of a return to aggression. That led to a relationship with the U.S. that was a dependent/enabler situation. Germany was a sort of silent partner in NATO, and completely in sync with anxious concerns about Soviet expansion. The U.S. bought German cooperation by assuming the latter’s military role and eating the costs. But fast forward to the present, and Germany’s chickens are coming home to roost. And this is the immutable nature of the capitalist model. Germany is all in on NATO... which is a de facto military representative of the EU. The demolition of the 20 billion-dollar Nordstream pipeline is the cost of allowing the U.S. to make policy on its behalf. The next elections in Germany should be interesting.
Not a problem for me comrade; I cannot abide a demoncrazy. That word is not to be found in a single document of the founding of this country.
So hence the divide, I favor a Republic where Rights are supposed to be guaranteed to the individual. That democRats have eroded the Republic to almost nothing remaining and now they blame what they have activelt destroyed as the problem is classical Bolshevik demonization.
NATO-UN-NWO-EU is all the same ball of tyranny imo. so we might agree on that, but not on your "solutions".
Yes, but you already admitted that you don't want to get along with everyone, so criticisms from you are expected.