So, Comrade, Who do you appoint as the "Chief of Non-Greed"??? The conundrum is not solved that easily. BTW, "stakeholders" is NWO Facism which I would assume you oppose???
Shareholders are people who put their money in investments to better their lives while accepting the inherent risks of doing so. That is Individual Liberty.
I am using a definition of stakeholder as anyone affected by a decision. One does not see a homeless person, a small farmer, or a factory peon at Davos, for example. When enough people (a critical mass) face their shadow sides like greed and heal then we will have true public servants.
So, Comrade, Who do you appoint as the "Chief of Non-Greed"??? The conundrum is not solved that easily. BTW, "stakeholders" is NWO Facism which I would assume you oppose???
Shareholders are people who put their money in investments to better their lives while accepting the inherent risks of doing so. That is Individual Liberty.
Dear comrade,
I am using a definition of stakeholder as anyone affected by a decision. One does not see a homeless person, a small farmer, or a factory peon at Davos, for example. When enough people (a critical mass) face their shadow sides like greed and heal then we will have true public servants.
I know what "stakeholder" means, and so do you; It's "the Masses", typical Bolshevik lingo.
Are you also voting for more JoBama democRat Hope & Change? The NWO Masters sure hope so.
There is only one party: the neocon/neolib servant of the oligarchy which is capitalist and increasingly fascist. (And right-wing.)
You avoided answering, "WHO is the Chief of Non-Greed?" What "system" do you advocate for? The Borg or the Individual?