Well if Zuckerberg is compromised (it seems likely) then he was compromised from day 1. Elon isn’t acting like someone who is compromised.
Maybe in time Bezos and Blue Origin steps up and SpaceX is marginalized. But until that happens they need SpaceX as much or more than SpaceX needs them.
Yes, for sure. I find Musk to be one of the most fascinating people around. I used to be a hater while finding him interesting. So I began watching every interview and podcast I could find of his. I might have been through all of them on YT and Rumble at this point.
I won’t admit to being smitten by him, but I’ve gone from hater - not going as far as joining the short army - to appreciating his work. I appreciate his moderate stance on climate even though I think his solution to renewable energy is not achievable.
I try to judge people based on actions and words. Musk isn’t perfect but I’ve not found evidence to place him firmly in the bad guy camp with Bill Gates, Klaus, etc.
Maybe you will be correct, it’s in the realm of possibility even if I think it’s not probable. I think we can both agree that watching the blue check Twitterati self-immolate is going to be great fun.
Sorry, but how does supporting the coup of an elected official in Bolivia in order to facilitate lithium mining for a spuriously green transport model [electric cars] not land someone squarely in the bad guy camp? #askingforafriend
Beyond a snarky tweet I’m not familiar with his involvement. I’m sure he was happy to get access to cheap raw materials. Is there evidence that he lobbied the CIA? That seems possible I guess.
Either way, not his finest moment. And he’s no saint. But I also don’t think he’s in the Gates and Schwab baddie crowd.
Ofc it is speculation because I am talking about the future. But it's *exactly* what the feds did with Zukerberg and he fell in line PDQ, remember?
Well if Zuckerberg is compromised (it seems likely) then he was compromised from day 1. Elon isn’t acting like someone who is compromised.
Maybe in time Bezos and Blue Origin steps up and SpaceX is marginalized. But until that happens they need SpaceX as much or more than SpaceX needs them.
You appear to trust that Musk's motives are virtuous more than I do.
Yes, for sure. I find Musk to be one of the most fascinating people around. I used to be a hater while finding him interesting. So I began watching every interview and podcast I could find of his. I might have been through all of them on YT and Rumble at this point.
I won’t admit to being smitten by him, but I’ve gone from hater - not going as far as joining the short army - to appreciating his work. I appreciate his moderate stance on climate even though I think his solution to renewable energy is not achievable.
I try to judge people based on actions and words. Musk isn’t perfect but I’ve not found evidence to place him firmly in the bad guy camp with Bill Gates, Klaus, etc.
Maybe you will be correct, it’s in the realm of possibility even if I think it’s not probable. I think we can both agree that watching the blue check Twitterati self-immolate is going to be great fun.
> Yes, for sure. I find Musk to be one of the most fascinating people around.
I agree. In the same was as Anna Sorokin or Adam Neumann. Absolutely fascinating. I'm perfectly serious.
Sorry, but how does supporting the coup of an elected official in Bolivia in order to facilitate lithium mining for a spuriously green transport model [electric cars] not land someone squarely in the bad guy camp? #askingforafriend
Beyond a snarky tweet I’m not familiar with his involvement. I’m sure he was happy to get access to cheap raw materials. Is there evidence that he lobbied the CIA? That seems possible I guess.
Either way, not his finest moment. And he’s no saint. But I also don’t think he’s in the Gates and Schwab baddie crowd.
He actually tweeted, “we’ll coup who we want” or something to that effect.