Please fill us in on what parts of Talbot's book might bear reconsidering. There is an old saying attributed to Thomas Aquinas, "Beware the man of one book."
From memory, I'm reluctant to be as helpful as I would like on this, since it would be impossible to be appropriately sensitive to the range of people with different perspectives who might read my response.
I do intend to touch on such topics when I can do it at sufficient length to avoid jumping to the wrong conclusions.
Perhaps books in the "Hidden History" series might be helpful.
2 would certainly be better than none!
More seriously, The D Chessboard certainly exposes Dulles et al, but promotes other myths.
Please fill us in on what parts of Talbot's book might bear reconsidering. There is an old saying attributed to Thomas Aquinas, "Beware the man of one book."
From memory, I'm reluctant to be as helpful as I would like on this, since it would be impossible to be appropriately sensitive to the range of people with different perspectives who might read my response.
I do intend to touch on such topics when I can do it at sufficient length to avoid jumping to the wrong conclusions.
Perhaps books in the "Hidden History" series might be helpful.
Sorry.