"Weather modification such as cloud seeding is not being used as warfare............."Was there a time when something that could be used by the military for warfare was not used? Anything? I'm unaware of such a time. This is particularly true with something as potentially effective as destroying the livelihood of your perceived adversary while blaming mother nature.
Making it rain a bit in Dubai does not destroy livelihoods, though, of course, it does mess with the system.
Yes, AI and satnavs are being used to make enemy planes fly into mountains. Drones and robots do what humans can’t do.
But saying that human climate change is not caused by warfare, fossil fuels and animal ag but by chemtrails, a few tests on SRM in the stratosphere and cloud seeding is just stupid.
However, climate colonialism is destroying livelihoods. The more the West continues to make war, burn and deforest, the more the poor and the Global South will continue to suffer the consequences of the climate crisis. The more crops will fail, the more people will die.
I can only speak for myself. Yes, the rising earth's temperatures are partly a result of human activity. So, to ward of this problem, the powers that shouldn't be decided to start dimming the sun to buy a little time.
This has caused additional problems like the thinning of the ozone layer.
Solar radiation management, aka geoengineering, is different from cloud seeding. Weather warfare is using patented technology, easily readable on the internet, to achieve various agendas.
For example, Hurricane Helene was not normal. The rainfall totals were not normal. The agendas involved? I'll leave that up to readers if they want to investigate.
Hurricane Helene was of course a normal event of extreme weather being more extreme due to human induced climate and environmental change. The agendas involved in claiming that it was deliberate and not part of anthropogenic climate change which should be addressed? I'll leave it up to readers if they want to investigate.
"Weather modification such as cloud seeding is not being used as warfare............."Was there a time when something that could be used by the military for warfare was not used? Anything? I'm unaware of such a time. This is particularly true with something as potentially effective as destroying the livelihood of your perceived adversary while blaming mother nature.
Making it rain a bit in Dubai does not destroy livelihoods, though, of course, it does mess with the system.
Yes, AI and satnavs are being used to make enemy planes fly into mountains. Drones and robots do what humans can’t do.
But saying that human climate change is not caused by warfare, fossil fuels and animal ag but by chemtrails, a few tests on SRM in the stratosphere and cloud seeding is just stupid.
However, climate colonialism is destroying livelihoods. The more the West continues to make war, burn and deforest, the more the poor and the Global South will continue to suffer the consequences of the climate crisis. The more crops will fail, the more people will die.
I can only speak for myself. Yes, the rising earth's temperatures are partly a result of human activity. So, to ward of this problem, the powers that shouldn't be decided to start dimming the sun to buy a little time.
This has caused additional problems like the thinning of the ozone layer.
Solar radiation management, aka geoengineering, is different from cloud seeding. Weather warfare is using patented technology, easily readable on the internet, to achieve various agendas.
For example, Hurricane Helene was not normal. The rainfall totals were not normal. The agendas involved? I'll leave that up to readers if they want to investigate.
I agree. SRM is complete crap in itself and as a way to avoid addressing climate change . I've written about it at length. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/im-anti-vax-and-anti-geoengineering?utm_source=publication-search
Hurricane Helene was of course a normal event of extreme weather being more extreme due to human induced climate and environmental change. The agendas involved in claiming that it was deliberate and not part of anthropogenic climate change which should be addressed? I'll leave it up to readers if they want to investigate.